Evaluación del consumo de calcio en Costa Rica y Panamá con la calculadora de calcio de la International Osteoporosis Foundation / Assessment of calcium intake in Costa Rica and Panama with the International Osteoporosis Foundation calcium calculator

Introducción: una ingesta adecuada de calcio es fundamental durante todo el curso de la vida. A pesar de esto, el consumo mundial de calcio es deficiente. En Centroamérica se tienen pocos datos sobre el tema. Objetivo: evaluar el consumo diario de calcio en la población adulta de Costa Rica y Panamá. Métodos: se realizó una encuesta a la población adulta (> 18 años) en ambos países. En aquellos sujetos que aceptaron ser encuestados, se aplicó un cuestionario específicamente diseñado para el estudio con información demográfica, estilos de vida y dieta. Se utilizó la calculadora de calcio de la International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) para cuantificar su ingesta de calcio. Resultados: el estudio incluyó a 1189 participantes, el 50 % eran hombres. La mediana de la ingesta de calcio fue de 862 mg/d (RIC: 650,5 a 1115) en Costa Rica y de 825,5 mg/d (RIC: 579,75 a 1029,2) en Panamá. Se encontraron diferencias significativas entre la ingesta de calcio y el grupo de edad en los costarricenses, mientras que en la población panameña se encontraron diferencias en la ingesta de calcio de acuerdo con el nivel educativo. Conclusiones: este estudio es el primero realizado en América Central con la calculadora de calcio de la IOF. Nuestro estudio muestra que la ingesta de calcio es deficiente en Costa Rica y Panamá. Es necesario establecer campañas educativas en ambos países para corregir esta deficiencia. (AU)

Introduction: calcium intake is fundamental over the whole life cycle; despite this, the world consumption of calcium is deficient. In Central America, there is little data on calcium intake. Objective: to evaluate daily calcium intake in the adult population of Costa Rica and Panama. Methods: an adult's population (> 18) survey was conducted in both countries. A questionnaire specifically design for the study was applied to subjects that were willing to participate after they signed of the informed consent form. The International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) calcium calculator was used to quantify their calcium intake. Results: the study included 1189 participants, 50 % were men. The median calcium intake was 862 mg/d (IQR, 650.5 to 1115) in Costa Rica and 825.5 mg/d (IQR, 579.75 to 1029.2) in Panama. Significant differences were found between calcium intake and age group in Costa Ricans, while in the Panamanian population differences were found in calcium intake according to educational level. Conclusion: this study is the first one conducted in Central America using the IOF calcium intake calculator. The study shows that calcium intake is deficient in Costa Rica and Panama. It is necessary to establish educational campaigns in both countries to correct this deficiency. (AU)

[Assessment of calcium intake in Costa Rica and Panama with the International Osteoporosis Foundation calcium calculator]. / Evaluación del consumo de calcio en Costa Rica y Panamá con la calculadora de calcio de la International Osteoporosis Foundation.

Introduction: Introduction: calcium intake is fundamental over the whole life cycle; despite this, the world consumption of calcium is deficient. In Central America, there is little data on calcium intake. Objective: to evaluate daily calcium intake in the adult population of Costa Rica and Panama. Methods: an adult's population (> 18) survey was conducted in both countries. A questionnaire specifically design for the study was applied to subjects that were willing to participate after they signed of the informed consent form. The International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) calcium calculator was used to quantify their calcium intake. Results: the study included 1189 participants, 50 % were men. The median calcium intake was 862 mg/d (IQR, 650.5 to 1115) in Costa Rica and 825.5 mg/d (IQR, 579.75 to 1029.2) in Panama. Significant differences were found between calcium intake and age group in Costa Ricans, while in the Panamanian population differences were found in calcium intake according to educational level. Conclusion: this study is the first one conducted in Central America using the IOF calcium intake calculator. The study shows that calcium intake is deficient in Costa Rica and Panama. It is necessary to establish educational campaigns in both countries to correct this deficiency.

Introducción: Introducción: una ingesta adecuada de calcio es fundamental durante todo el curso de la vida. A pesar de esto, el consumo mundial de calcio es deficiente. En Centroamérica se tienen pocos datos sobre el tema. Objetivo: evaluar el consumo diario de calcio en la población adulta de Costa Rica y Panamá. Métodos: se realizó una encuesta a la población adulta (> 18 años) en ambos países. En aquellos sujetos que aceptaron ser encuestados, se aplicó un cuestionario específicamente diseñado para el estudio con información demográfica, estilos de vida y dieta. Se utilizó la calculadora de calcio de la International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) para cuantificar su ingesta de calcio. Resultados: el estudio incluyó a 1189 participantes, el 50 % eran hombres. La mediana de la ingesta de calcio fue de 862 mg/d (RIC: 650,5 a 1115) en Costa Rica y de 825,5 mg/d (RIC: 579,75 a 1029,2) en Panamá. Se encontraron diferencias significativas entre la ingesta de calcio y el grupo de edad en los costarricenses, mientras que en la población panameña se encontraron diferencias en la ingesta de calcio de acuerdo con el nivel educativo. Conclusiones: este estudio es el primero realizado en América Central con la calculadora de calcio de la IOF. Nuestro estudio muestra que la ingesta de calcio es deficiente en Costa Rica y Panamá. Es necesario establecer campañas educativas en ambos países para corregir esta deficiencia.

How to initiate and develop Fracture Liaison Services (FLS). Recommendations from the IOF Capture the Fracture® FLS Mentors in Brazil.

Expected number of fragility fractures in Brazil, raising the healthcare prioritization for interventions that reduce fracture risk. An FLS is dedicated to managing patient with fragility fracture to reduce risk of another fracture. We review FLSs cost-effectiveness and describe key components to effectively set up FLS in Brazil. PURPOSE: To create a guideline to show health professionals, hospital managers, and stakeholders in Brazil the importance of secondary fracture prevention and how to implement a Fracture Liaison Service. METHODS: We review the cost-effectiveness for FLSs in Brazil. We describe the key components needed to set up an effective FLS including methods for identification, investigation, treatment indication, including bone drugs, supplementation, physical activity, fall prevention, and monitoring. The staffing of FLSs, value of regional clinical networks and quality improvement are also described as a guide for healthcare professionals and decision makers in Brazil. RESULTS: An FLS is a service dedicated to identifying, assessing, recommending treatment, and monitoring patient who present with a fragility fracture reducing the risk of another fracture. FLS has been implemented in Brazil since 2012 overcoming a large geography and a complex health system. Even the limitations, restrictions, differences, and characteristics of each region, it is possible for health institutions to initiate an FLS, adapted to own available resources and meet the stages of identification, investigation, treatment, and monitoring. CONCLUSION: The peculiarity of the Brazilian healthcare system means FLS implementation needs to be tailored to local reality. However, even with limitations, any attempt to capture patients who suffer a fracture due to bone fragility is effective and reduces the risk of further fractures.

Short- and long-term prognostic factors associated with functional recovery in elderly patients with hip fracture: A systematic review.

This systematic review aimed to identify short- and long-term associated factors to functional recovery of elderly hip fracture patients after discharge. We identified 43 studies reporting 74 associated factors to functional recovery; most of them were biological, sociodemographic, or inherent factors to patients' baseline characteristics, including their pre-facture functional capacity. PURPOSE: This systematic review aimed to identify short- and long-term associated factors to functional recovery of elderly hip fracture patients after hospital discharge. We assessed the use of the hip fracture core-set and key-performance indicators for secondary fracture reduction. METHODS: A search was performed in seven electronic databases. Observational studies reporting predictors after usual care of elderly patients with hip fracture diagnoses receiving surgical or conservative treatment were included. Primary outcomes considered were part of the domains corresponding to functional capacity. RESULTS: Of 3873 references identified, and after the screening and selection process, 43 studies were included. Sixty-one functional measures were identified for ten functional outcomes, including BADLs, IADLs, ambulation, and mobility. Biological characteristics such as age, sex, comorbidities, cognitive status, nutritional state, and biochemical parameters are significantly associated. Determinants such as contact and size of social network and those related to institutional care quality are relevant for functional recovery at six and 12 months. Age, pre-fracture function, cognitive status, and complications continue to be associated five years after discharge. We found 74 associated factors to functional recovery of elderly hip fracture patients. Ten of the studies reported rehabilitation programs as suggested in KPI 9; none used the complete hip fracture core-set. CONCLUSION: Most of the associated factors for functional recovery of elderly hip fracture were biological, sociodemographic, or inherent factors to patients' baseline characteristics, including their pre-facture functional capacity. For the core-set and KPI's, we found an insufficient use and report. This study reports 61 different instruments to measure functional capacity. REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO (CRD42020149563).

Fragility fractures: proposal of the best practice through the fracture coordination units: the experience of Mexico.

Fragility fractures represent a health problem in Mexico and in the world. This paper reviews and puts forward the implementation of Fracture Liaison Services (FLS) as a feasible and cost-effective alternative in health institutions in our country through the identification, treatment, and follow-up of this type of fractures.